To Whom It May Concern
Dear esteemed readers,
While at Wordcamp a couple weeks ago, I was asked about what I write about on my blog. Good question. Something I often wonder myself. I proceeded to delay my response while I thought of some answer that would best communicate how I felt inside:
“Umm, well, some photography and technology news I guess, but not—”
“Ahhh, so it’s a personal blog?”
There was something about the way they said “personal” that was demeaning. As if no blog could possibly be worth reading if it’s personal. Looking around that room at the blank faces of “social media probloggers” trying to make a penny off a new medium, I could see that they missed it.
Write top ten lists with killer post titles. Spam your blog on every social network out there. Don’t be passionate, personal, or exhaustive. Make your posts easily skimable and don’t write about more than one topic. Build a community, entertain your readers, and make sure you submit to Digg. And for goodness sake, NEVER write a post over 500 words—the readers might get bored.
And then I get criticized because I don’t want to “embrace new media”.
Listen here: spamming people and treating your audience like mindless zombies is not “new media” or “social media”. It’s more like old media than anything else. The Internet doesn’t exist so we can constantly pamper the reader in a desperate attempt to plead with them to stick around. We don’t have to constantly push “punch the monkey” ads in the reader’s face, or tease them with juicy headlines and Digg bait. That’s what television is—reporters repeating the same rhetoric while teasing viewers with headlines and yelling them not to go away because, by golly, they’ll be right back.
You’re missing the point.
The Internet exists so that anyone with something to say can say it. And be heard. Everything has an audience—you just have to have something worth listening to. Unfortunately, we’ve over-saturated the world of “personal blogs” with stories of our girlfriend’s brother’s dog, diluting our message, and giving personal blogs a bad reputation as useless, mundane, and senseless.
I like how Jack Shedd puts it:
There are only three requirements I’ve ever sussed out from reading excellent sites. Write well, write often, and write with passion. It seems if you can manage that, you’ll find an audience.
Back to the question: “What do you write about on your blog?”
Such a simple question. What do I write about? Well, anything that I find interesting. It is MichaelMistretta.com after all, and if you’re not interested in what I’m interested in, why are you here in the first place?
But I want to go deeper than that. Something more.
Ideas.
That’s what I want to write about. Thoughts and ideas that inspire. Sure, there will still be photography and tech-related posts as those are still things I love. But my focus has changed. I guess you could say this blog has always reflected Michael Mistretta, and Michael Mistretta’s direction is changing.
This ‘change’ probably won’t affect you at all. My interests have stayed the same. But I’ve decided to publish this more for me than for you. Everything I’ve written up to this point has been a steady progression towards this decision.
Looking at some of the blogs that have inspired me over the last 10 months, I’ve also decided to change the way MM.com will be published.
-
From John Gruber, I learned that it’s okay to have a linked list—and make it interesting at that.
-
From Shawn Blanc, I discovered the novelty of publishing an exhaustive post, written masterfully down to the 5000th word, debunking the myth of readers only wanting short, scannable posts.
-
And from Seth Godin, I found the value of consistently writing short, succinct posts that communicate a single idea in the most powerful way possible.
Anyone can grasp onto one of the three of these concepts, and claim it as their writing style. And that’s how I treated them for awhile—one being better than the other. If you were lazy, you posted a link. If you didn’t have much to say, you wrote a short post. And if you had a lot of time on your hands, you wrote an exhaustive post.
I couldn’t have been more wrong.
You see, none of these mediums are better than any of the others. They can all suck, and they can all be the greatest thing since sliced bread.
I used to think of a post topic and ask myself which type of post—short, long, or link—I felt like writing. No more. Now, when I think of an idea for a post I ask myself what the best way to communicate is.
If someone else said it better than I ever could, why waste time repeating them? Use a link. If you have an idea that doesn’t require a 4000 word post, by all means, don’t write the 4000 word post. It’s not a matter of one being better than another as much as it is one complimenting each other.
-
Again, to quote Jack Shedd:
If you’re worth reading, someone will read you. If you’re worth watching, someone will watch you. If you’re worth hearing, someone will listen.
And that’s exactly what I intend to do. Thank you for sticking with me throughout this ride. Things are about to get a whole lot better.
-Michael